|
Written By Yushau A. Shuaib
CONFAB: RELIGION AND
MEDIA
The Guardian March 28, New Nigerian April 3, Daily Champion
April 8, Nigerian Tribune April 15,
Leadership April 17, Daily Trust April 19, The Punch
April 29, 2005
“Kano
seeks supremacy of Sharia over Constitution.” That was one of the lead stories
of Daily Trust newspaper of
March 17, 2005,
in which it was reported that the
Kano
State delegation to the National Political Reform Conference demanded
constitutional amendments to make Islamic Law supreme over provisions of the
constitution. You will expect that other media would carry a story with this
import, possibly under different headlines. But it was only the Daily Trust that
used it that week. Others it appears, succumbed to self-imposed editorial
censorship and influence of media ownership, probably for political or security
reasons.
The media like the
conference is an autonomous arena of public debate, which provides to forum for
rational and critical deliberation. With or without the ongoing national
dialogue, it has effectively and positively acted as agency of rationality and
empowerment which the rich and the poor use to voice out their grievances. On
the other hand, religion has served as a unifying instrument of brotherhood that
binds its adherents to spiritually and emotionally pursue the goal of
establishing oneness with the Creator. The media and religion are easily
manipulated for mass-opinion and political struggle in Nigeria. Therefore, the
threat to the ongoing conference may surely be how the media and religion are
handled to serve the cause of the confab and Nigeria.
The President in his inaugural speech downplayed the impact of religion in our
national life by emphasizing on political and economic issues that are desirable
for a united and prosperous
Nigeria. He,
therefore, did not spare time to reflect on the implication of having the
Chairman, Secretary and Deputy Secretary of the confab belonging to the same
religious faith. He could not have also noticed the allegation that Muslims
representatives in the confab are 160 against 233 Christians. Daily Trust and
its sister publication, Weekly Trust, devoted much space to hammer on the
lopsided composition of leadership and membership of the confab. In addition,
respected Northern writers and columnists like Kabir Yusuf, Garbadeen, Sunusi
Lamido Sunusi, Haruna Muhammad and Sam Nda Isaiah have argued amongst themselves
on the alleged uncomplimentary remarks by Rev Father Hassan Kukah, Secretary to
the conference in justifying the membership composition.
Some of the writers wondered why the clergyman made such remarks when he knows
that he is highly respected by the Muslims and Northerners alike for his
principles, nonpartisanship, intellectual prowess, eloquence and objectivity in
national discourse. When Gen. Buhari was alleged to have made controversial
remarks on sharia a few years ago, Kukah took the pain to visit the former head
of state and later exonerated him of any blame. His tributes to Northern
Muslims, like that on late Adamu Dan Kabo, portrayed him as someone who has
fraternized with and understood Muslims more than any other Christian leader and
has always been cautious on the Sharia and other sensitive religious issues.
While other groups
like youth and women folk alleged marginalization in the composition of
delegates to the confab, there was no fuss on the media nominees, possibly
because the major media are geographically located in the South and owned by
Christians. The disparity could only be blamed on the Northern elites, both
Muslims and Christians, who do not value the importance of media but rather
believe in other business enterprises and lobbying for public offices. The
delegates representing Newspaper Proprietors Association of Nigeria, Mr. Nduka
Obaigbena of Thisday and Chief Ajibola Ogunshola of Punch, are pragmatists who
see their media as purely professional outfits. Nevertheless, Cultural and
social interest of ownership cannot sometimes be divorced from editorial
contents. The global media moguls like Rupert Murdoch, Henry Luce, Sylvio
Berlusconi and the Warner Brothers have used their empire to protect other
businesses and deployed them to protect their political patrons. In the local
scene, MKO Abiola, a southern Muslim used his National Concord to balance the
equilibrium and occasionally influenced the promotion of Islamic values as is
being done by Alex Ibru who supports the Christian faith with dedication of
pullout (Ibru Centre) in the Sunday Guardian to promote charity programmes,
ecumenism and ethics. Unfortunately, the Northern elites have constantly
frustrated the efforts of young Northern publishers and media outfits and yet
turn back to cry themselves hoarse over marginalization or play up
religious sentiments whenever they lose patronage.
While one may argue
that the media delegates merit the nomination, even though regionally lopsided,
not all the religious representatives at the confab are truly representatives of
their respective faiths. The composition appears more to be an amalgam of the
political class. For instance, the list of Muslim delegates is short of
reputable Islamic scholars and Imams and does not reflect prominent faithfuls
from other regions, like Mujahid Asari Dokubo, a famous Muslim from the Ijaw
minority tribe of
Southern Nigeria,
who could make positive contributions on equity and justice than politicians and
businessmen.
It is unfortunate that
whenever a religious issue crops up, the South-North dichotomy is replayed up
regardless of the fact that in some least expected states, Muslim and Christian
faithful are 50-50 like Ogun and Osun in the South and Plateau and Taraba in the
North. That means to say that not all Northerners are Muslims, likewise not all
Southerners are Christians. We can understand and appreciate our differences and
united for a common goal. Given our background and experiences, it is necessary
to advise that religious issues should not dominate discussions at the confab,
because of its sensitivity and the disenchantment from a section of
Nigeria
on membership composition. Other sensitive issues like Fiscal Federalism,
federal character principles, political structure, power sharing, resource
control and the age long settler- indigene dispute can be the core issues for
discussion. The delegates should also find solutions to youth
unemployment, gender inequality, violent crimes, endemic corruption amongst the
leadership, elite-induced sectional crises and the failure of our elders to
address the seeming disunity in the polity.
The media can
influence the agenda and outcome of the forum if it is sincere in its drive to
save this nation. Afterall, the ongoing confab is an outcome of aggressive media
agitations on the need for a national dialogue to chart a new course and proffer
solutions to our myriads of problems. The media have only to ensure that it
reflects the views and values of the stakeholders germane to the promotion of
our unity and oneness. As the watchdog too, it should be kind enough to be fair
and just when the government errs in its responsibility to the populace.
Please read rejoinders
on the above by
clicking RECONFAB
|