|
Written By Yushau A. Shuaib
STILL ON EXCESS OIL EARNINGS*
Nigerian Tribune October 11, Daily Trust October 15, Anchor October 18,
The
Comet October 18, Vanguard October 22, 2001, Post Express October 22, 2001
Not until recently when the state governors
instructed their commissioners of finance to boycott the monthly federation
account committee meeting, did the reality of the potential harm of excess
earnings to the statutory account of the federation dawn on us all. The amount,
which is about $1.2 billion, is the excess oil receipt in the last few months.
The budget estimates of federal and state governments were predicated on $20 per
barrel of oil. But fortunately, the price in the global market has been higher
than anticipated revenue and more than the budgetary provisions.
Many arguments and debates had been made on
the contentious issue of the oil windfall. The Central Bank, which represents
the federal government, has warned against the disbursement, saying it may cause
galloping inflation in the economy. The International Monetary Fund, which
represents the international multilateral financial institutions, has also
cautioned that it may dislocate financial equilibrium by increasing unemployment
rates and affecting our balance of payment. The labour groups and manufacturers,
for fear of further dwindling value of local currency, are among those against
the sharing at this critical time.
However, on the other side of the divide are
some bankers who professed to have the capacity to invest the fund for
infrastructural development and to help the financial sector from further
distress. There are also state governments too where some of their chief
executives have even declared that they might deny their workforce their monthly
remuneration, to drive home their argumentation and arm-twist the federal
authorities to succumb to their demands for the release of the excesses
immediately.
Governor Ahmed Bola Tinubu, who seemed to
speak the minds of the state governors in his recent article, “Use and misuse of
Nigeria’s oil windfall Myth and reality,” reasoned that the federal government
had no constitutional or legal right to impound or save on behalf of other
tiers, federally collected revenues due to other beneficiaries of the federation
accounts. He argued further that the federal government had no proof of being a
better economic and financial manager. He stated this in apparent reaction to
the allegations of financial recklessness against some state governments.
This windfall would not be the first, as the
country has, on several occasions in the past, witnessed such huge manna from
heaven but was unfortunately misappropriated. It had happened during military
dictatorships where accountability, transparency and openness in governance were
alien concepts. The accruals, which were never disclosed, were also
surreptitiously disbursed and expended on frivolous programmes and projects for
selfish aggrandizements. A vivid case that comes to mind was during the
nine-month Gulf war in 1990 when a foreign medium disclosed to our bewilderment
that the country had earned about $12 billion as excess revenue from oil during
the crisis.
The military era may be pardoned for lack of
accountability and mismanagement of funds, afterall they did away with the
constitution and enacted laws to suit the whims and caprices of their
dictatorial leadership. But in this democratic dispensation, there are enabling
laws and relevant bodies that serve as guide and are responsible for ways and
manners such funds should be utilized in the national interest. In fact, there
are also institutions that determine the necessity or otherwise of the
disbursements of such funds.
From all these, one thing is clear and this is
that the excess from the sales of crude oil as a result of upward swing in the
price of oil does not belong to only one but all the beneficiaries of the
federation account. These include the federal, state and local governments. It
is unfortunate that while the clamour is going on, it seems nobody is bothered
about the fact that the country has over relied on the earnings from oil, which
makes all the economic variables and indicators to exclusively rely on it. It is
the bedrock of our creditworthiness, government revenue, gross domestic
products, real income, foreign exchange transactions, boosting the external
reserve and also the only sustenance of many states and local governments in the
country.
It is surprising to learn that the country, in
this democratic dispensation, is so blessed that monthly allocations from the
federation account in recent times, excluding the excesses, have reached an
average of N90 billion against the less than N30 billion shared during the
preceding military governments. Even some states are so lucky that they receive
their allocations in billions of naira, courtesy of the derivation principle.
Yet many are asking, where is the dividend of democracy, apart from frequent
tussles on the sharing of the national cake?
The militant posture of some of the
beneficiaries, to the question of whether or not to disburse the excess
accruals, is unfortunate, and uncalled for, if the constitutional provisions are
strictly adhered to by all the parties. Recently, the Chairman Revenue
Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission, Alhaji Hamman Tukur, disclosed
that there is nothing to be christened “oil windfalls” because budgetary
projections are made based on certain estimated amounts, therefore anything that
is realized outside the budget cannot be labelled a windfall but can be
transferred to the stabilization account which belongs to the Federal Republic
of Nigeria and not any particular tier of government. He explained further that
withdrawals from such an account are constitutionally the prerogative of the
President through approvals from the National Assembly. It can therefore not be
disbursed arbitrarily.
The constitution is very explicit on the
sharing of the revenue from the federation account. Section 162 of the 1999
constitution states that the federation shall maintain a special account to be
called the federation account into which shall be paid all revenues collected by
the government of the federation. It goes further to state that the president,
upon receipt of advice from the revenue mobilization allocation, proposes for
revenue allocation from the federation accounts. The said section of the
constitution and subsequent subsections categorically empower the National
Assembly to prescribe the distribution of any amount standing to the credit of
the federation account as it is necessary in the interest of the national
economy.
The fundamental reason for having a national
reserve account is for a future inevitability. Some see the present imbroglio on
the disbursement of the funds as misconception and misinformation between the
states and the Federal Ministry of Finance, which surprisingly meet monthly on
the platform of the Federation Account Allocation Committee in Abuja. If that
forum cannot provide a better understanding, and improve cordial
intergovernmental relationships, one may wonder the significance of the body in
the face of the fact that it is not constitutionally recognized.
Since the excess revenue is an unexpected and
unbudgeted proceed, it is necessary to keep the fund to take care of the rainy
day. After all, it is said that spending above estimated budget is a deficit, a
liability which most of the time is abhorred by economists and is open to abuse
and misappropriation. One might not have opposed the disbursement if the
beneficiaries would be able to judiciously and appropriately spend the money for
worthwhile capital projects towards creating more employment opportunities once
the huge funds are released. But who can guarantee this?
Since the constitution is clear on this, it
becomes necessary for constituted bodies, especially the National Assembly, to
exercise its statutory power to legislate over the sharing or otherwise of the
funds based on the reality on ground. It is reasonable, however, to recommend
that once a budget is passed for implementation by the National Assembly, all
other excesses acquired above the expected revenue should be saved in a special
account for subsequent fiscal seasons. This would enable the relevant tiers of
government prepare comprehensive and achievable budget proposals for economic
rejuvenation and for the betterment of the electorate and the populace in the
following financial period.
It is also necessary for all the stakeholders
to observe the importance of dialogue as a veritable tool of resolving
conflicts. Disagreements over such sensitive and delicate issue should be handed
more maturely and professionally so that the global investment community we
crave for, would take us seriously by developing interests and having full
confidence in our economic environment.
Stakeholders in this matter and other
contentious issues should learn to embrace dialogue as a means of resolving
issues. This is a mature way of making progress, especially in a democratic
dispensation. The system ought not be overheated. Continued heightening of
tension is dangerous to the polity. It could lead to dislocation in the system,
with serious consequences.
*Please see a rejoinder by a commissioner
RE: Oil Windfall Palaver and a response by the
author Click THIS.
|