|
Media Relations Tips
by YAShuaib
12.
GET THE FEEDBACK
*
Feedback provides the barometer to measure the success or failure of a programme
*
Know the objective before the feedback
*
Ensure execution of appropriate media programmes
*
Monitor the media output regularly
*
Undertake daily media review
*
File relevant press clips
*
Employ independent agency to conduct a survey on perception
There are arguments over
the desirability and possibility of securing quantitative measurement of public
relations activities compared to other professions. Other professions claim they
provide statistical results of their performances. Medical doctors measure their
feat by the number of cured patients; lawyers list their won cases, and
marketers present data on increased in sales. Public relations activities are
not tangible and cannot be easily analysed in practical terms. They deal with
perceptions, states of mind, public attitudes and feelings. It is difficult, for
instance, to interpret whether a smile is deceptive or a genuine sign of
happiness. Likewise, a mournful face may not necessarily denote anger. But
through the survey technique, organisations receive feedback on public relations
activities.
In media relations, a
section of public relations, the result of media related activities is measured
by the volume and quality of media appearances and publications. These are the
anticipated results in the use of the media technique. The impact of a media
activity in changing or sustaining public perceptions falls within the ambit of
public relations, even though the media officer can facilitate. There are
methods of measurement for the assessment of feedback in media relations.
The scope of media
relations covers, basically, liaison and information management with the
press. The output is monitored and statistics provided on media coverage. The
feedback can only be determined after the objective is stated. Every media
activity has a set objective to be achieved for specified reasons. The objective
may be the overall corporate goals of the organisation in meeting its production
target, customer satisfaction, molding public attitude or winning more
patronage. An appropriate media campaign can be undertaken to achieve results.
The impact measurement is done by regular monitoring through press clippings,
media reviews, surveys and statistical analyses.
The best period of
el-Rufai, as a public officer, was when he was the DG of BPE, where he received
favourable feedback from the reports of finance correspondents (FICAN) whom he
related with closely and they too handled their job professionally. As blunt and
frank he was on privatization issues, he received several favourable editorials
and public commentaries from the media. But when he moved to the Federal Capital
Territory as Minister, he realised that financial correspondents were different
from city reporters because of their different orientations. In his first year
of assuming office as a minister, it was controversy and criticisms that trailed
his pronouncements and programmes. He seems to study the feedback as he
occasionally adjusts and corrects the misconceptions. I remember that one of my
writings on his emergence as minister was entitled “El-Rufai: From Privatisation
to Demolition” which was posted on some news websites and Nigeria’s print media.
Surprisingly, some of the actions he had wished to execute immediately,
especially against poor citizens, were postponed as he concentrated his energy
on those many people thought were untouchable, who can easily break the laws of
the land.
It is only through the
feedback mechanism that an organization realizes the success or failure of its
programme. Feedback provides the bases for sustenance, change or improvement in
the activities geared to achieve corporate objectives and goals. Feedback comes
in three stages: execution level, where you determine the application of the
proposed methods; output level: to determine the media usage of the message and
fairness of the reports; and lastly the perception level where the impact of the
publicity is assessed.
Monitoring
Monitoring of the media
mention can be done regularly or occasionally, based on the timing of a
programme. It is recommended, however, that monitoring be done daily since
unexpected reactions and commentaries on the working of the organisation or its
personalities can come from any quarters. The tools for monitoring all the
electronic and print media include television, radio, newspapers, magazines,
journals and even the Internet.
Clippings
Some agencies provide
services where relevant information materials from the media are cut and filed
for references. Bigger organisations provide newspapers for their media sections
to cut off relevant and related news and comments on the organisations. Due to
the cost of newspapers and magazines and the inconvenience and waste that
shredding of papers entails, organisations prefer to photocopy portions of
papers where relevant news items are found.
Media Review
Summaries of commentaries
and news items are written and typed to analyse the nature of coverage: whether
they appear in the segments of news, features, editorials, adverts, letters to
the editors, interviews, gossips etc. Reviews also indicate the occasions that
prompted the mentioning. Review is preferred by most chief executive officers
who are busy with official assignments and therefore have little time for
reading newspapers or listening to the electronic media.
Survey
If the organisation
wishes to study the impact of a campaign on the public, the best way to get the
feedback is through the survey method where questionnaires are printed and
distributed randomly or to a target public. In preparing the questionnaire,
anonymity of the sponsors may be necessary to ensure fair and objective
responses on the issue at stake. If there are specific targets from whom
feedback is required, they should be identified and a convenient environment
chosen for the distribution of the questionnaires. But to achieve independent
and objective feedback, a reliable agency can conduct the survey. Some
organisations even influence the media to help gauge public opinions on their
services and/or image. This is done through vox pop, interview or flying a kite
to prompt reactions.
Statistical Analysis
The systematic analysis
of media mention is better demonstrated in a table of columns and rows by
attaching figures to the coverage. The media relations officer at a regular
interval of monthly, quarterly or yearly indicate in figures, the time and
quantity of mentioning under subheading: favourable, fair and critical exposure.
The table can further be drawn in graphs to give an instant and clear picture on
how the media have covered the organisation. This will help the organisation in
sustaining, correcting or improving the tempo of their media activities. It may
also indicate, by comparison, the media that have covered the organisation
adequately and fairly against those that give it less attention or are critical.
Once the Chairman
receives the usually regular media cuttings and reviews and realises that an
item requires urgent attention, he forwards it to relevant committees and
departments for appropriate actions. It is worthy to note that a simple
editorial or investigative report can have a serious impact, and influence
policy directions. A well-researched and constructive opinion can even persuade
rethinking in execution of programmes. Relevant press clips that are feedback to
programmes are also pasted on the notice board for the information of staff and
visitors. The placements are not entirely restricted to those on the
organisation’s activities, but also related information items. On a quarterly
basis, the Committee on Public Relations is updated on how the Commission was
covered through an analytical submission that shows the rate of positive and
negative mentions from editorials, news stories, commentaries and interviews.
These give the organization ideas on areas where it needs to sustain, improve,
reorder or jettison its activities.
|