|
Written
By Yushau A. Shuaib
NITEL: Saving Our Collective Patrimony
Leadership February 25, Guardian February 26, New
Nigerian February 27,
Thisday March 2, Daily Sun March 3 and Economic
Confidential March 2008
It gladdens my heart that at last some of the
process of sales of our collective assets as a nation, which have been covertly
bequeathed in the name of privatisation to the very few, are being reviewed
especially when they have failed in their operations. I once argued that the
craze for privatization of our collective patrimony on the excuses of failures
of public service if not done cautiously we may end off selling the Central
Bank, Minting company, the police and even the army on the pretext that they
perform below expectation as government’s funded public institutions.
Some have argued that the present administration
has not achieved anything than reversals. While I am not speaking for the
government, but as a Nigerian citizen, I must admit that most of the reversals
like the present one are in the interest of Nigeria, its workforce and the
economy. I wonder what could have happened to the cost of living if the present
government did not immediately reverse the sales of refineries, increased fuel
price and added VAT charges.
The recent press statement by the Minister of
Information and Communications, Mr. John Odey on the recent decision over the
sale of NITEL to octopus Transcorp, is a very courageous action taken by the
government after series of meeting on the plight of the acquired company and
notices for positive changes in NITEL but without any progress from acquirers.
John Odey pointed out that Transcorp failed in
core areas of operational Liquidity, Planning and Procurement, Network,
Interconnectivity etc based on the purchased agreement with Bureau for Public
Enterprises and NITEL/MTEL. These failures of Transcorp, he added has resulted
in NITEL/MTEL losing subscribers, unable to attract new investments to build up
and maintain the network to increase their market share and demoralized
NITEL/MTEL workers. More shocking is that one year after the take over, no
staff has been given permanent appointment, a gross violation of our National
Labour Act (Cap. 198, Section 7 (i) and (ii), resulting in continuing loss of
experienced and competent employees to other operators.
Yet the same conglomerate has stripped off NITEL
by selling some of its assets to highest bidders considering the admission of
garrison-commander of Ibadan politics, Chief Lamidi Adedibu that he bought one
of the properties after an advertisement for bidders. In fact the staff of the
organization, who have been expressing delight over the development, stated that
the networks have almost collapsed under Transcorp management. It has been
discovered that apart from the sales of some NITEL properties, many Nigerian
workers have been sacked, salaries of existing staff either delayed or have been
withdrawn which further dampened their morale.
As conventional practice all over the world,
public institutions, apart from being ran to protect security and integrity of a
nation, their staff are motivated with incentives to provide efficient and
affordable social services to the public. These incentives in most public
institutions in Nigeria are lacking, not even realistic wages are provided that
tend to force many into corrupt practices.
One wonders if some of the rich, politicians
including retired military generals are not the causes of failures of some of
the public institutions. Their incursions into public service through coups and
party-politics, as office holders were influenced to further corner our
collective wealth as they engaged in actions that are detrimental to corporate
existence of those institutions. They bastardised the service through
recruitments of their inexperienced cronies and relations to serve as chief
executives of those agencies while awarding arbitrary contracts and sometimes on
fictitious projects. Yet they had the gut to abuse the ill-treated civil
servants and the service as corrupt. Haba!
While destroying the institutions, in their bid
for material acquisitions, they either established their own private enterprises
to provide the service at exorbitant cost or on the alternatives used the back
door to acquire the so-called inefficient agencies in the name of privatization.
The same class of people who want us to pay dearly for social services, when
they were young had benefited from free education, free healthcare and highly
subsided and affordable social services at the period we had functional and
efficient internal security, electricity and especially transportation services
provided by Nigeria Airways and Railways. Those public institutions were well
managed by Nigerians. Today most of those services are not affordable to the
common citizens as they are largely provided by profit-oriented private
enterprises.
It is public knowledge that some of the so-called
successful private individuals apart from indulging in conspiracy and insiders’
dealings, made their wealth from excessive government’s patronage through
inflated contracts, tax rebates, concessions and policies that are sometimes
detrimental to government’s responsibilities to its citizens.
Not that one is against an individual owning a
business; at least we witnessed a genuine and sincere process where ordinary
documents (without a single pin) were offered by NCC as licenses to
telecommunication companies and the government raked in millions of dollars
without making a contribution. From the scratch the successful bidders have
successfully built their structures and infrastructures, recruited large number
of our graduates and provide indirect self-employment to million others. Yet
apart from engaging in massive corporate social responsibility activities, these
corporations return billions of Naira as taxes annually to the government’s
coffer.
It was suspected that the unpatriotic leadership
in charge of NITEL had engaged in insiders dealing to give leverage to the
emerging private telecom operators. At that time with a single dial, calls went
into NITEL lines from private networks and vice-versa. No sooner than the
operators started getting subscribers through patriotic access facilities of
NITEL, than the operators started to block in-coming and outgoing calls to
NITEL’s subscribers, a seeming deliberate and business conspiracy that
influenced the drop in NITEL customers. Interestingly the so-called incompetent
staffs of NITEL who had been frustrated by political leadership, are today some
of the experienced and well-paid staff in some of the private telecom operators.
Nigeria’s public institutions can perform better
if there are motivation and sincerity of purposes from their leaderships. Today
we are living witnesses to success stories of such reputable institutions like
NAFDAC, Pencom, NCC, EFCC, VON, SON, RMAFC, CBN amongst several others whose
chief executives have demonstrated leadership qualities through political will,
competence and unalloyed patriotism. While there are similar successful private
companies too ran by individuals, we may lose count of several businesses and
corporations ran as private entities that have collapsed due to ineptitude and
indiscipline of the owners.
The professed due process and rules of law should not only be restricted to
legal terms and strict adherence to constitutionality that may delay the
process, but also timely intervention of government to protect its citizens and
companies it has stake in from derailing. It is a welcome development the latest
decision of the government to bring in new core investors that is an industry
player with the requisite focus, technical expertise, managerial experience and
financial capacity to take controlling shares in NITEL/MTEL.
We should encourage genuine investors by providing
enabling environment by which they can emulate telecom operators who went
through bidding for licenses and start from the scratch. If they are desirous of
revamping public institutions they can be offered managerial responsibilities at
fee and must be reputable not like pentascope management. We must support the
latest courageous actions of the government in protecting our collective
patrimony.
Please read the rejoinders by clicking
|