|
Written By Yushau A. Shuaib
RE:
In defence of Saudi arabia*
The Pen Newspaper
January 1991
The article written by Yasha’u Hameed in the Pen entitled “In
Defence of Saudi Arabia,” does not only make uninteresting reading but sounds
myopic, parochial and indeed provocative. The writer began by beautifully, but
briefly, enumerating the good contributions being made by the Saudi government
to world progress, scholarship to Muslim students, financial assistance to other
Muslim nations, including Palestine, whom he accused Saddam of buying their
supports with scud missiles attacks on Israel.
Though one cannot at this juncture state with accuracy the exact
amount being spent by the Saudi government in this direction, nevertheless, one
can assume that the non-Muslim world today benefits more from the Saudi oil
riches, given the massive investments of its petrol-dollar surplus in
Euro-Christian and Judo-American economies. Interests and profits generated by
these investments are channeled into anti-Islamic activities worldwide. Afterall
the natural beneficiaries of these surpluses are supposed to be the Muslim
population worldwide. But what happens?
The Eritreans are dying in the hands of the Najibullahs. The John
Garangs are giving the Sudanese Muslims tough time and above all, the
Palestinians are dying everyday in the hands of the Jews. If the petrol-dollar,
generated by the Saudi economy, is rightly utilized, all these problems would
never have been with us. We expect more from them.
One point Mr. Abdul Hameed emphasized is the fact that nobody on
earth can protect the Saudis from Saddam, except America. I don’t know whether
the Americans are genuinely out to protect the interests of the Saudis or their
personal interests and those of the multinational oil companies or that of
Israel? .
One thing I know is that the Yankees are not out to protect the
interests of Saudi Arabia and its neighbours, for these amount to protecting the
interests of Muslims and Islam. And Allah (S.W.T.) has clearly warned us against
seeking their protection (see Qur’an: 3:28). This is because, Mr. Abdul-Hameed
has empathized that there is nothing inherently wrong for the Saudis to invite
the Yankees to protect them.
Another mistake the writer made is the contention that the Gulf
crisis has nothing to do with religion. This is where I disagree with him most.
I see the Gulf crisis as another brand of Zionist expansionism. In the 1940s,
Zionism was a movement for the creation of an Israel State but today, i.e., 20s
and 21st century, Zionism
has reached its peak. It is now a movement for the consolidation of the State of
Israel.
We all know that Saddam has the 4th
biggest military machine in the Middle east, including Israel. So, there is the
growing fear that Israel no longer has the upper hand in the region. And we all
know the strategic importance of Israel to the U.S.A. So this military power in
the hands of Saddam, poses a very serious threat to Israel and its masters.
Since Israel cannot destroy Saddam and his military machine, their masters,
i.e., U.S.A., decided to do the job for them.
I think this is the crux of the mater. Indeed, this is what makes
it fundamentally a religious issue. Had the crisis been confirmed an Iraq-Kuwait
conflict, then there is no way one could interpret it as a religious war.
Mr. Abdul-Hameed, who mistakenly saw the war as having no
religious undertone, went ahead and suggested neutrality on the crisis. This is
exactly what the Yankees have been advocating throughout the crisis.
This is why they have been paying dearly to keep Israel from
directly participating in the conflict. If the Judo-Christian world cannot
remain neutral, then the Muslims also cannot afford the luxury of being neutral.
It was rightly said that “every spectator is either a coward or a traitor.”
Yes! Let us all rise above our ego. We must appreciate the fact
that the Gulf crisis is an attempt to recolonise the Muslims and their religion.
We should all remember that neocolonialism, like colonialism, is a violent
phenomenon and only violence can overcome violence.
*Please click and read the
reference article In
Defence Of Saudia
|